[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Subscribe]
DM: TMC's DarwinFrom: Will Dwinnell Date: Tue, 22 Jul 1997 07:03:30 -0400 (EDT) "We're looking at a major investment in TMC's Darwin product. Has anyone on the list had a chance to really put it to the test?" To some degree, I have. The last version I worked with would have been whatever Thinking Machines was shipping in February (I worked at a beta site), which would have been release 1.Beta 2_16 or possibly a little later, so some of this may have changed. At the time, Darwin consisted of 3 learning tools: a neural network, CARTŪ and a k-nearest-neighbor system (which TMC referred to as "memory based reasoning"). The neural network struck me as fairly ordinary (backprop, conjugate gradient) and their CARTŪ system seemed to function adequately. I felt that the k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) system was not terribly useful in the big data mining environment they are marketing to, and I told them so when I visited them in Bedford. k-NN, in its raw form, requires that all the training examples be carried about for use during recall since the examples are the model. This struck me as completely unwieldy since data miners who would buy this kind of software would have rather large databases of examples and implementation of this sort of thing in code would get messy (at least, compare to something like a neural network or a CARTŪ -derived decision tree). I know TMC had been making changes the entire time I used Darwin so maybe there are more features now (such as clustering). Will Dwinnell
|
MHonArc
2.2.0