![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Subscribe]
DM: Book Announcement: Paradigms of Artificial Intelligence, Springer-VerlagFrom: Achim Hoffmann Date: by brap-1.cais.net (mbox firschng)(with Cubic Circle's cucipop (v1.31 1998/05/13) Wed Dec 1 08:06:06 1999)
My apologies, if you receive this announcement more than once.
Paradigms of Artificial Intelligence
A Methodological and Computational Analysis
by Achim Hoffmann, Springer-Verlag 1998
http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~achim/Book/
>From the back
==============
"Paradigms of Artificial Intelligence" presents a new methodolo-
gical analysis of the two competing research paradigms of artifi-
cial intelligence and cognitive science: the symbolic versus the
connectionist paradigm. It argues that much of the discussion put
forward for either paradigm misses the point. Most of the argu-
ments in the debates on the two paradigms concentrate on the
question whether the nature of intelligence or cognition is prop-
erly accommodated by one or the other paradigm. Opposed to that
is the analysis in this book, which concentrates on the question
which of the paradigms accommodates the "user" of a developed
theory or technique. The "user", who may be an engineer or scien-
tist, has to be able to grasp the theory and to competently the
methods which are developed. Consequently, besides the nature of
intelligence and cognition, the book derives new objectives for
future research which will help to integrate aspects of both
paradigms to obtain more powerful AI techniques and to promote a
deeper understanding of cognition.
The book presents the fundamental ideas of both, the symbolic as
well as the connectionist paradigm. Along with an introduction
to the philosophical foundations, an exposition of some of the
typical techniques of each paradigm is presented in the first two
parts. This is followed by the mentioned analysis of the two
paradigms in the third part.
The book is intended for researchers, practitioners, advanced
students, and interested observers of the developing fields of
artificial intelligence and cognitive science. Providing accessi-
ble introductions to the basic ideas of both paradigms, it is al-
so suitable as a textbook for a subject on the topic at an ad-
vanced level in computer science, philosophy, cognitive science,
or psychology.
>From the preface
=================
The field of artificial intelligence (AI), formally founded in
1956, attempts to understand, model and design intelligent sys-
tems. Since the beginning of AI, two alternative approaches were
pursued to model intelligence: on the one hand, there was the
symbolic approach which was a mathematically oriented way of ab-
stractly describing processes leading to intelligent behaviour.
On the other hand, there was a rather physiologically oriented
approach, which favoured the modelling of brain functions in or-
der to reverse-engineer intelligence. Between the late 1960s and
the mid-1980s, virtually all research in the field of AI and cog-
nitive science was conducted in the symbolic paradigm. This was
due to the highly influential analysis of the capabilities and
limitations of the perceptron by [Minsky and Papert, 1969]. The
perceptron was a very popular neural model at that time. In the
mid-1980s a renaissance of neural networks took place under the
new title of connectionism, challenging the dominant symbolic
paradigm of AI. The `brain-oriented' connectionist paradigm
claims that research in the traditional symbolic paradigm cannot
be successful since symbols are insufficient to model crucial as-
pects of cognition and intelligence. Since then a debate between
the advocates of both paradigms is taking place, which frequently
tends to become polemic in many writings on the virtues and vices
of either the symbolic or the connectionist paradigm. Advocates
on both sides have often neither appreciated nor really addressed
each others arguments or concerns. Besides this somewhat frus-
trating state of the debate, the main motivation for writing this
book was the methodological analysis of both paradigms, which is
presented in part III of this book and which I feel has been long
overdue. In part III, I set out to develop criteria which any
successful method for building AI systems and any successful the-
ory for understanding cognition has to fulfill. The main argu-
ments put forward by the advocates on both sides fail to address
the methodologically important and ultimately decisive question
for or against a paradigm:
How feasible is the development of an AI system or the
understanding of a theory of cognition?
The significance of this question is: it is not only the nature
of an intelligent system or the phenomenon of cognition itself
which plays the crucial role, but also the human subject who is
to perform the design or who wants to understand a theory of cog-
nition. The arguments for or against one of the paradigms have,
by and large, completely forgotten the role of the human subject.
The specific capabilities and limitations of the human subject to
understand a theory or a number of design steps needs to be an
instrumental criterion in deciding which of the paradigms is more
appropriate. Furthermore, the human subject's capabilities and
limitations have to provide the guideline for the development of
more suitable frameworks for AI and cognitive science. Hence, the
major theme of this book are methodological considerations re-
garding the form and purpose of a theory, which could and should
be the outcome of our scientific endeavours in AI and cognitive
science. This book is written for researchers, students, and
technically skilled observers of the rapidly evolving fields of
AI and cognitive science alike. While the third part is putting
forward my methodological criticism, part I and II While the
third part is putting forward my methodological criticism, part I
and II provide the fundamental ideas and basic techniques of the
symbolic and connectionist paradigm respectively. The first two
parts are mainly written for those readers, which are new to the
field, or are only familiar with one of the paradigms, to allow
an easy grasp of the essential ideas of both paradigms. Both
parts present the kernel of each paradigm without attempting to
cover the details of latest developments, as those do not affect
the fundamental ideas. The methodological analysis of both
paradigms with respect to their suitability for building AI sys-
tems and for understanding cognition is presented in part III.
Available from Springer-Verlag.
Price approximately (DEM 98, US$ 49)
|
MHonArc 2.2.0