[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Subscribe]
DM: RE: Cost Savings with Data Mining?From: osborn Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 09:20:28 +1100 Rebecca Buchheit asked: > I'm preparing a grant proposal and would like to cite examples where the > use of KDD/data mining was able to produce significant cost savings. I > have done extensive searching on the web, but have been unable to find > much that specifically cites how much (in dollar amounts, rather than > just saying "we estimate that we saved a significant amount of time and > money") was saved. Can anyone point me to a paper or resource about a > case study that actually reports cost savings? I've had a go at doing this for a few projects I've completed (for the same reasons as Rebecca's - to build a firmer case for future proposals). I'm going a bit beyond Rebecca's brief, but the point is the same... While the information gain - in terms of both NEW and more PRECISE signal from DM is (fairly) easy to identify, you have to go a few further steps up the organisation's chain of management and planning to quantify savings. Firstly, there's the issue of implementation: Where was the DM derived signal factored into decision making, planning and measurement within the client's business processes (including revision of business processes). Secondly, there is a serious issue of how business costs are attributed. On one project (for example), there was such a diversity of ways of costing, and of recording cashflows, that profitability calculations (immediate, or in the sense of net present value) could make ANYTHING look good, to ANYTHING look dismal. Eg, status quo and downsizing can be easily made to look attractive (status quo incurs low costs and downsizing generates a net cash flow as less new projects start - less upfront costs - and more 'old' projects complete - more final payments). Various NPV and opportunity valuations make new innovations look attractive, depending on how risk factors into calculations. Where you you put various overhead and infrastructure costs. ETC. Certainly, one project we completed was audited independently, and it was worth (in NPV terms) an estimated $AUD140M..$AUD200M, which was MUCH more than the costs of the project. This was for a FS client, and details cannot be released. One other selling point for Rebecca would be that good predictive and exploratory DM required good data quality. The project's value has a multiplier effect in ensuring better data quality within the organisation. However, there is often resistance to seriously biting the bullet on DQ in many organisations (Oh God, they may have to change some business processes and reporting/ measurement practices!!!). I'm not saying it can't be done - we do it at times - but there are many issues (not directly related to DM) that get in the way. I'm very interested to hear other views. Tom. Dr Tom Osborn Director of Modelling NTF Decision Support Consultants Level 7, 1 York Street SYDNEY NSW 2000 AUSTRALIA phone: +61 2 9252 0600 fax: +61 2 9251 9894
|
MHonArc
2.2.0